Legal Opinion
Ortiz v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 5, 2017No. Civil Action No. 16–10595–TSHPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMOTHY HILLMAN, DISTRICT JUDGE
Background
Plaintiff, Evelyn Marcial Ortiz ("Plaintiff" or "Ortiz") brings an employment discrimination action against Defendants, the Federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") and several BOP employees: Warden Jeffery Grondolsky ("Grondolsky"), Associate Warden Richard H. Russell ("Russell"), and Captain Michael Bollinger ("Bollinger"). In her amended complaint (Docket No. 15) ("Complaint"), Plaintiff alleges the Defendants deprived her of certain constitutionally protected rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Count I);…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Evans v. Staples, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Amirault v. City of MaldenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
- Amirault v. City of MaldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Evans v. Staples, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Johnson v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.