Coy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.
This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries received by the plaintiff on June 5, 1905, while a passenger on one of the defendant’s cars. At the close of the evidence the presiding judge* directed a verdict for the defendant, and by agreement reported the case “upon all the evidence that has been properly admitted, and such other evidence, if any, as has been offered and not admitted which should have been admitted, and no other.” If a verdict should not have been directed for the defendant, judgment is to be entered for the plaintiff for $1,900; otherwise, judgment is to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kuhlen v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Glennen v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Jackson v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Beverley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- Kelley v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
- Schaeffer v. General Motors Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Holton v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Fiorentino v. A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Jackson v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.