Legal Opinion
Krueger v. New York Telephone Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 22, 1995No. 93 Civ. 0178 (JGK)PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*448 OPINION AND ORDER
KOELTL, District Judge.
This action is brought by six former employees of New York Telephone Company (“NYT”) claiming discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (“ADEA”), and the New York Human Rights Law, Executive Law § 290 et seq. (the “HRL”), and unlawful interference with pension rights under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”).
In motions already pending before the Court, plaintiffs seek to maintain a collective opt-in action for the ADEA claims.1 One hundred and sixty-two consents…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marcera v. ChinlundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Kentucky v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Lombard v. MarceraSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Severtson v. Phillips Beverage Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1991
- Heagney v. European American BankDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Hoffman v. Construction Protective Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Light v. Allstate InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
- Smith v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
- Schwartz v. Celestial Seasonings, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1999
- Collins v. International Dairy QueenDistrict Court, M.D. Georgia · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.