Legal Opinion
Smith v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided May 5, 2006No. CIV.A. 2:04-CV-774PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KING, United States Magistrate Judge.
BACKGROUND
The named plaintiffs bring this action on behalf of themselves and other employees subject to Lowe’s “Salaried Plus Overtime Eligible Compensation Plan” under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 [“FLSA”], 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), and the Ohio Minimum Wage Act, [“OMWA”], O.R.C. § 4112.01 et seq. Plaintiffs allege that certain salaried employees, with such job titles as Department Manager, Assistant Department Manager and Specialist, are not exempt from the overtime requirements of the FLSA and OMWA, Complaint, H16, Doc. No. 1, are…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States Department of Labor v. Cole Enterprises, Inc., and William C. ColeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Evelyn M. Highlander v. K.F.C. National Management Co., D/B/A Zantigo Heublin Corporation Zantigo Mexican RestaurantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
- O'Brien v. Town of AgawamCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Thiessen v. General Electric Capital Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Olivo v. GMAC Mortgage Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Brooke Clark v. A&L Homecare &Training Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
- Brittmon v. Upreach, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Soto v. Castlerock Farming & Transport, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2012
- Barrus v. Dick's Sporting Goods, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Hill v. BauerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.