Legal Opinion
Severtson v. Phillips Beverage Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 27, 1991No. 3-90 CIV 304PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ALSOP, Chief Judge.
The above entitled matter comes before the court upon defendants’ objection to the February 28, 1991 order of United States Magistrate Judge Franklin L. Noel. The magistrate judge’s order is not to be set aside unless it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 28 U.S.C. § 1636; Fed. R.Civ.P. 72(a); LR72.1(b).
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs, five former employees of Phillips Beverage Company and Ed. Phillips & Sons Co., filed this age discrimination suit on May 9, 1990, alleging that they were terminated because of their age in violation of the Age Discrimination in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Leonard David GriffinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Shapero v. Kentucky Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1988
- Shushan v. University of Colorado at BoulderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Pritchard v. Dent Wizard International Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2002
- Bouaphakeo v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2008
- Camper v. Home Quality Management Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Quinteros v. Sparkle Cleaning, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.