Ingle v. Allen

HILL, Judge.

Defendants Carnell Ingle Allen and Ruth Ingle Johnson bring forth five assignments of error concerning jurisdiction, instructions to the jury, admissibility of testimony, and submission of the issue of punitive damages to the jury. We have examined each of the assignments and find no basis for reversal.

Defendants first contend the trial court erred in allowing plaintiff to raise in superior court the issues relating to defendant’s alleged breach of fiduciary duty. Defendants assert that the clerk of superior court has exclusive original jurisdiction of “the administration,…