Legal Opinion

Wakefield v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 30, 1990No. 89-1588PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, William Blake Wakefield, appeals from a summary judgment for the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company ("State Farm"), in this action to collect uninsured/underinsured motorist protection benefits, and medical expenses and payment for damage to property under the newly-acquired-vehicles provision of an automobile insurance policy. We affirm.

The plaintiff's son, William Paul Wakefield, was killed when the heavy duty 3/4-ton utility truck that he was driving collided with another vehicle. The plaintiff had purchased the truck approximately one week before the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  2. Stafford v. MISS. VALLEY TITLE INS. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Davison v. LowerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1988

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Twin City Fire Insurance v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Harris v. GillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co. v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  4. Moore v. ReevesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Ross Neely Systems, Inc. v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API