Twin City Fire Insurance v. Ohio Casualty Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
This is a diversity insurance coverage dispute governed by Alabama law. The district court granted summary judgment to the appellee, finding that a no-action clause in the policy bars coverage. We reverse and remand to the district court for further proceedings.
I. FACTS
The facts are undisputed. G.A. West & Co. (“West”) agreed to supply labor to appellant Alabama River Pulp Co. (“ARP”). The contract between West and ARP provided, in part:
To the fullest extent permitted by law, [West] shall indemnify and hold harmless ARP ... from and against any and all claims, costs,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hilburn v. Murata Electronics North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. SladeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
- Ralph E. Coblentz, as Administrator, D.B.N. Of the Estate of Edward Thomas Coblentz, Deceased v. American Surety Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Red Giant Oil Co. v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Shivers v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 349Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Baker v. Birmingham Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Collado v. J. & G. Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
- Cherri Walker v. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2023
- HR Acquisition I Corp. v. Twin City Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.