Legal Opinion
Gregory v. Lovlien
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided June 6, 2001No. 98-CV-0048; A107198PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover for alleged legal malpractice, stating in part that two of the plaintiffs had assigned their claims to the third. Defendant moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint on the ground that legal malpractice claims may not be assigned. The trial court granted defendant’s motion and entered judgment against plaintiffs. On plaintiffs’ appeal, we reverse and remand.
Because this case arises on defendant’s motion to dismiss, we take the facts alleged in plaintiffs’ second amended complaint as true. Donald and Evelyn Gregory purchased three duplexes in 1994. When…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Comegys v. VasseSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Hale v. GroceOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- Hedlund Manufacturing Co. v. Weiser, Stapler & SpivakSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Groce v. Fidelity General Insurance CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of EadieOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Gurski v. Rosenblum and Filan, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Quality Chiropractic, PC v. Farmers InsuranceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2002
- Cowan Liebowitz & Latman, PC v. KaplanSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
- Villanueva v. First American Title InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.