Legal Opinion

Magill v. Westinghouse Electric Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 23, 1967No. Appeals, Nos. 348 and 349PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Watkins, J.,

This is an appeal by the employer from the order of the Court of Common Pleas No. 5 of Philadelphia County, affirming the decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board’s award of benefits for occupational disease benefits to the claimant’s decedent and his widow; and an appeal by the claimant from the order of the court affirming the Workmen’s Compensation Board in allowing credits to the employee as the result of insurance payments.

This appeal of the employer is based on the contention that there was not sufficient competent medical *344testimony to support the board’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Roschak Et Ux. v. Vulcan Iron WorksSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Smith v. Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Masouskie v. Hammond Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Bednar v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Busfield Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Demmery v. National Union Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  2. Michael v. Roadway Express, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. DEMMERY v. NUF INS. CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API