Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1960No. Appeal, No. 240PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

This is a workmen’s compensation case in which the Referee and the Board found that claimant’s present disability, if any, is not attributable to the accident alleged. Compensation was therefore disallowed on the ground that claimant had failed to carry his burden *265of proof. Upon appeal to the County Court of Allegheny County, claimant’s exceptions were overruled and judgment was entered in favor of the defendant. This appeal followed.

The record discloses that Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Company was engaged in the business of manufacturing railroad cars. Appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Elonis v. Lytle Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Washko v. Ruckno, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Gavula v. Sims Company.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Erwin v. L. & H. CONSTRUCTION CO.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  5. Bogan v. Smoothway Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. DeMascola v. LancasterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Czankner v. Sky Top Lodge, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Reed v. Glidden Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. Chernetsky v. William Penn Stripping Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Scannella v. Salerno Importing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API