Levy v. Brill
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
On September 2, 1947, defendant’s demurrer to the complaint was sustained, 10 days to amend. September 15th, plaintiff filed a motion that “a final adjudication” be entered “so the controversy may continue in a higher court.” This motion was denied the same day. Plaintiff having failed to amend his complaint, a judgment for costs in favor of defendant was entered October 16th. Nothing further occurred until June 24, 1950, when plaintiff filed a “Motion to Reinstate Action” and “to restore proceedings” on the grounds “that they appear irregular on their face.” (In what respect does not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Jackson v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Fisch & Co., Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Raahauge v. RaahaugeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
3Cited by7 opinions
- Taper v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ransom v. Los Angeles City High School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Verdier v. VerdierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- City of Los Angeles v. SchweitzerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Fritz v. FooteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.