Legal Opinion

Austin v. Harbin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1895PublishedCited by 7 opinions

EROM GRAINGER. Appeal from Chancery Court of Grainger County. H. G. Kyle, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtWilkes, J.

The bill and cross bill in this cause were filed to set aside, for fraud, a deed made by Harbin to Hague. The Chancellor sustained the bill and cross bill, and set aside the deeds, and Hague, the vendee, alone appealed and assigned errors. The cause has been heard by the Court of Chancery Appeals, and ■ two of the members of that Court have signed a written finding that there was no fraud in the transaction, and that Court reversed the decree of the Chancellor, and the attacking creditors have appealed to this Court.

It is insisted that there was error in the Court of Chancery Appeals…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Electric Light Co. v. Gas Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Frischer & Co. v. Bakelite CorporationCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  3. Hughes v. PowersTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Jenkins v. DeWarTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Athearn v. NicolCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API