Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Powers

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1897PublishedCited by 15 opinions

PROM CLAIBORNE. Appeal from Chancery Court of Claiborne County. Hugh G. Kyle, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

This is an attachment and garnishment bill, whereby the complainants, Hughes & 'Davis, sought to collect a debt of $246 from the defendant, David Powers. An attachment was levied *482on a tract of land described in the bill, as the property of Powers, the debtor. He permitted the bill to be taken for confessed as to himself; but C. M. Marsee, the garnishee, filed an answer, in which he averred that he purchased the land attached from Powers, and took his deed thereto long before the filing of the bill; that he executed to Powers two negotiable notes for $500 each, as part consideration for the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Austin v. HarbinTennessee Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Limor v. Fleet Mortgage GroupTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Jones v. MosleyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946
  3. Childers v. Wm. H. Coleman Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State Ex Rel. Freeze v. TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Building & Loan Ass'n v. RodgersTennessee Supreme Court · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API