United States v. Espinoza
U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
BAUM, Chief Judge:
We have carefully considered the well articulated defense brief which urges disapproval of the punitive discharge as inappropriate for this accused and his offenses, but in the final analysis must disagree with the course advocated. In so doing, we have rejected that portion of appellant’s argument that submits two clemency actions by the Commandant as authority for the proposition that a bad conduct discharge in this case is disproportionately severe. Clemency measures are distinctly different from sentence appropriateness determinations made by Courts of *552Military Review.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. HealyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- United States v. OlingerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- United States v. ColdironU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. LeonardU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. HardinU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1989
- Garcia v. United StatesU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1989
- United States v. DuckworthU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 1996
- United States v. SantosU S Coast Guard Court of Military Review · 1990