Torrent v. Hamilton
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Muskegon. (Dickerman, J.) Bill to foreclose four mortgages. Defendants Hamilton appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.
This is a bill to foreclose four distinct mortgages, given by the same parties, and held by complainant. It is demurred to as multifarious.
The first mortgage is dated November 10, 1877, is for $10,500, and covers an undivided one-fourth of the following property: Blocks 341, 342, 344, and 88, and lots 4 and 5, and the westerly three-fourths of lot 3, of block 87. The amount unpaid upon the mortgage is $2,500. On January 31, 1881, blocks 88 and 342, and lots 4 and 5, and the westerly three-fourths of lot 3, of block 87, were subdivided into lots.
The second mortgage is dated November 2, 1886,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gaines Et Ux. v. ChewSupreme Court of the United States · 1844
- Clegg v. VarnellTexas Supreme Court · 1857
- People ex rel. Pierce v. MorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
- Marshall v. MeansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
- Sweet v. ConverseMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hardware Dealers Mutual Insurance v. R. H. Hidey, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1957
- Gilmer v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Bajorek v. KurtzMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
- Raniak v. PokorneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Dixie Fire Insurance v. American Confectionery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.