Legal Opinion

West v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 30, 1970No. Civ. 35523PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THOMPSON, J.

Appellants, plaintiffs in an action to quiet title and to declare an oil and gas lease terminated because hydrocarbons are no longer being produced “in paying quantities,” appeal from an adverse judgment. We affirm the trial court.

Facts

In 1924 appellants’ predecessors in interest entered into a community oil and gas lease with respondent’s predecessor in interest. The lease provides in part: “Said lease shall continue for a period of five (5) years from and after the date of this Agreement, and so long thereafter as oil and/or gas may be produced on the demised premises in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Renner v. Huntington Etc. Oil & Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Transport Oil Co. v. Exeter Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Renner v. Huntington-Hawthorne Oil & Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Montana-Fresno Oil Co. v. PowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Barnard v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  2. Imperial Colliery Company v. Oxy USA Inc., (Formerly Cities Service Oil Company)Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
  3. Lough v. Coal Oil, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Talbott v. Condevco, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Stewart v. Amerada Hess Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API