Legal Opinion
Hughes v. Lamay
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 7, 2005No. AC 25240PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Rosemary A. Hughes, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered after it denied her motion for a new trial. On appeal, she claims that the court improperly refused to allow the admission of testimony about the effect on her of kerosene fumes and improperly denied her motion for a new trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
*380The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. On June 1, 1999, the plaintiff entered into a one year lease with the defendants, Joseph Lamay and Kevin Lamay, for the first floor of a multifamily dwelling at 31…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Walton v. Town of New HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Malmberg v. LopezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Childs v. BainerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Wichers v. HatchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Embalmers' Supply Co. v. GiannittiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Hall v. BergmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Rossman v. MorascoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Froom Development Corp. v. Developers Realty, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Medes v. Geico Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.