Legal Opinion

The Agricultural Bank of Mississippi and Others, in Error v. Charles Rice and Mary His Wife, and Martha Phipps

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 24, 1846PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

45 U.S. 225

4 How. 225

11 L.Ed. 949

THE AGRICULTURAL BANK OF MISSISSIPPI AND OTHERS,

PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR,

v.

CHARLES RICE AND MARY HIS WIFE, AND MARTHA

PHIPPS, DEFENDANTS.

January Term, 1846

THIS case was brought up, by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi.

It was an ejectment brought by the defendants in error against the Agricultural Bank and others, to recover two undivided third parts of a lot of ground in the city of Natchez, bounded as follows:—fronting on Main Street, between Canal and Wall Streets (formerly Front and Second…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hinde's Lessee v. LongworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. TUCKER v. MorelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  3. Martin v. DwellyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1830
  4. Greenleaf v. QueenSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  5. Butler v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1813

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cordano v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Harrison v. SimonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Bradley v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1886
  4. Falkinburg v. LucyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  5. Creosoted Wood Block Paving Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API