Legal Opinion

Creosoted Wood Block Paving Co. v. McKay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 26, 1919No. 8181PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from Dallas County Court; Kenneth Foree, Judge. Action by the Creosofed Wood Block Paving Company against A. C. McKay and others. From a judgment for only a part of the relief demanded, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

RÁSBURY, J.

Appellant sued appellees, A. C. McKay and his wife, upon a paving certificate issued by the city of Dallas for $294.71, interest thereon at 7 per cent, per annum from October 31, 1913, and for attorney’s fees and for foreclosure of a lien declared by the city and of a mechanic’s lien on lots 6 and 7, block 3078 — 95 of the city of Dallas, voluntarily executed by McKay and wife, to secure payment of the cost of such paving. The Investors’ Mortgage Security Company, Limited, who, it was alleged, had a lien on said property, was made a party to the suit, and judgment sought against it…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Houston Ice & Brewing Co. v. KeenanTexas Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Stone v. SledgeTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Storrie v. Houston City Street Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. LollarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Cordano v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Brazosport Savings & Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. State Trust Co. v. MorrisonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Creosoted Wood Block Paving Co. v. McKayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Savage v. RHEATexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. Texas Pac. Coal & Oil Co. v. PattonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API