Legal Opinion

Schelling v. Thomas

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1929No. Docket No. 6574PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUCAS, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal taken by defendant and cross-complainant L. J. Conley from a judgment and decree of foreclosure and sale in favor of plaintiff and respondent W. J. Schelling and defendant and cross-complainant E. N. Tooby.

The facts are that on September 22, 1922, respondent Schelling signed, as an accommodation maker, a $1,000 promissory note with defendant Rexford Thomas, thereby enabling the latter to borrow $1,000 from the First National Bank of Eureka. On the same date Rexford Thomas executed and delivered to respondent the following instrument:

"I hereby agree to turn…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Rice v. McCarthyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Goodrich v. TurneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Higgins v. MansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Coonrod v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1902

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Trimble v. TrimbleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. DoerrNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. People v. BuckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  4. Vierra v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Beemer v. RoherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API