Legal Opinion
Higgins v. Manson
California Supreme Court
Decided October 27, 1899No. S.F. No. 1738PublishedCited by 16 opinions
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Humboldt County. E. W. Wilson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
—Foreclosure. Defendant had judgment on a general demurrer to the complaint, from which plaintiff appeals.
The action is brought against defendant as administratrix of her deceased husband’s estate. The complaint alleges that Homer Manson in his lifetime executed and delivered to plaintiff his certain written instrument, of which the following is a copy:
“$100.00. - San Francisco, Cal., Sept. 3d, 1896.
“One day after date (without grace), I promise to pay to the order of Charles H. Higgins the sum of one hundred and no' |100 dollars for value received, with interest at the rate of one…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Payne v. . WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Preble v. AbrahamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kreling v. KrelingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- White Water Valley Canal Company v. ValletteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Daggett v. RankinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Harrigan v. GilchristWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Coast Bank v. MinderhoutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Carr v. HowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Leach Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.