Legal Opinion

People v. Romo

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1990No. F012148PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THAXTER, J.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of grand theft (Pen. Code, § 487, subd. 1). He admitted a sentence enhancement allegation of a prior felony conviction (Pen. Code, § 667.5, subd. (b)), and was thereafter sentenced to a three-year prison term. The sole issue he raises on appeal is that the court erred in refusing his proffered jury instruction on the claim-of-right defense. We will hold that the instruction was properly rejected because there was insufficient evidence to support the defense. Finding no error, we will affirm.

Facts

Raymond Hehn owned some land in the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. People v. FlannelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. HannonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. BarrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  5. People v. HendricksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. BarnettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. TufungaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. WootenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API