Legal Opinion

People v. Waidla

California Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 2000No. S020161PublishedCited by 552 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOSK, J.

This cause involves an appeal, which is automatic, from a judgment including a sentence of death against Tauno Waidla. A separate cause involves a similar appeal from a similar judgment against Peter Sakarias. (People v. Sakarias (2000) 22 Cal.4th 596 [94 Cal.Rptr.2d 17, 995 P.2d 152].)

I. Procedural History

On November 28, 1988, on behalf of the People of the State of California, the District Attorney of the County of Los Angeles presented an information to the superior court thereof against Waidla and Sakarias, accusing them of various felonies committed during the preceding…

2Cases cited81 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Wainwright v. WittSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by552 opinions

  1. Descamps v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. CoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

547 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API