Legal Opinion

Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly v. Employment Division

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1986No. 84-AB-1319; CA A33476; SC S 32662PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.

This case presents the question whether the Court of Appeals has the statutory authority to award costs against a private party in a contested case arising under Oregon’s Administrative Procedures Act (APA). We hold that it does not and, therefore, reverse that court’s order awarding costs in this case.

Claimant, petitioner in this appeal, worked as a law clerk for the law firm of Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly (employer). After his employment ended, he applied for unemployment benefits. An Employment Division referee determined that claimant was entitled to unemployment benefits, and the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sager v. McClendenOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Shetterly v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Blacknall v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Stelljes v. State Bd. of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  4. DeYoung v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Callahan v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API