Stelljes v. State Bd. of Parole
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
The issue in these consolidated cases is whether petitioners were prevailing parties in the Court of Appeals and, thus, entitled to recover prevailing party fees under ORS 20.190. 1 The Court of Appeals denied their claims. We affirm.
Petitioners are in the Oregon State Penitentiary. Each was the subject of a Board of Parole (Board) order setting his initial release date. In petitions to the Court of Appeals for judicial review, each challenged his release date. ORS 144.335(1). 2 Before the Court of Appeals made any decision on the merits, the Board withdrew both orders and then issued new…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lewis v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State Highway Commission v. Efem Warehouse Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
- Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Shetterly, Irick & Shetterly v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1986
3Cited by11 opinions
- Malot v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- DeYoung v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Blacknall v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISIONCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. Don Whitaker Logging, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Dept. of Justice v. SpearOregon Supreme Court · 1989
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.