Legal Opinion
Hilleary v. Bromley
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1946No. 30383PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
The sole question presented is whether plaintiff adduced evidence sufficient to entitle him to have his case submitted to the jury.
The plaintiff complains that the defendants, with knowledge of the purpose for which the ladders were to be used, and with knowledge that a defective ladder furnished for such purpose would be an instrumentality of great hazard and danger to the plaintiff, nevertheless furnished a defective ladder which they, in the exercise of reasonable care, should have known was defective and unsuitable for the purpose for which it was intended; that the negligence of the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Bennett v. Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Hamden Lodge No. 517 v. Ohio Fuel Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
- Mulchey v. Methodist Religious SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Arizona Binghampton Copper Co. v. DicksonArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Kalash v. Los Angeles Ladder Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ruta v. Breckenridge-Remy Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
- Meny v. CarlsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Cooper v. RooseOhio Supreme Court · 1949
- Petty v. Cranston Print Works CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Babylon v. ScrutonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.