Legal Opinion

McConkey v. McGhan Medical Corp.

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided July 6, 2000No. 1:98-cr-00003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JARVIS, District Judge.

This is a products liability action brought by plaintiffs Don and Mary Grace McConkey against McGhan Medical Corporation, Nusil Technology, and Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (hereinafter “3M”) for damages sustained by their alleged part in the production and supply of silicone breast implants. Currently pending is 3M’s motion for summary judgment [Court File # 15]. For the reasons below, 3M’s motion regarding all claims will be granted.

I

Factual Background

The following factual allegations are considered in the light most favorable to the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Bain v. WellsTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  4. McClung v. Delta Square Ltd. PartnershipTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lowendahl v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. T.H. v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Smith v. PFIZER INC.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API