Legal Opinion

Illinois Central Railroad v. Illinois

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 18, 1896No. 217PublishedCited by 53 opinions

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. This was a petition for a writ of mandamus, based upon the Revised Statutes of Illinois of 1889, c. 114, § 88, which is as follows: “Every railroad corporation shall cause its passenger trains to stop upon its arrival at each station, advertised by such corporation as a place for receiving and discharging passengers’ upon and from such trains, a sufficient length of time to receive and let off such passengers with safety:…

Read the full summary

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. This was a petition for a writ of mandamus, based upon the Revised Statutes of Illinois of 1889, c. 114, § 88, which is as follows: “Every railroad corporation shall cause its passenger trains to stop upon its arrival at each station, advertised by such corporation as a place for receiving and discharging passengers’ upon and from such trains, a sufficient length of time to receive and let off such passengers with safety: Provided, all regular passenger trains shall stop a sufficient length of time, at the railroad station of county seats,…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice GS-bay

The line of railroad communication, crossing the OhioBiver at Cairo, and of which the Illinois Central Bailroad forms part, has been established by Congress as a national highway for the accommodation, of interstate commerce and of the mails of the United States, and as such has been recognized and promoted by the State of Illinois. This will clearly appear by a brief recapitulation of the acts of Congress and the statutes of Illinois upon the subject.

Congress, in the act of September 20, 1850, c. 61, granted a right of way, and sections of the public lands, to the State of Illinois, to aid…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Peete v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  4. Concord v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. SC Hwy. Dept. v. Barnwell Bros.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Michigan Public Utilities Commission v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1925

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API