Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Ohio
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hablan
This action was commenced before a justice of the peace of the county of Cuyahoga, Ohio, to recover the penalty prescribed by section 3320 of the Revised Statutes of that State;
That section is a part of a chapter relating to railroad companies, and, as amended by the act of April 13,1889, provides:
“Each company shall cause three, each way, of its regular trains carrying passengers, -if so many are run daily; Sundays excepted, to stop at a station, city or village, containing over three thousand inhabitants, fora time sufficient to receive and let off passengers; if a company, or any agent or…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Cooley v. Board of Wardens of Port of Philadelphia Ex Rel. Soc. for Relief of Distressed PilotsSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Smith v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Railroad Co. v. HusenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by190 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
185 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.