Legal Opinion
Kim v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided April 27, 1990No. Civ. 89-00512 DAEPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
DAVID A. EZRA, District Judge.
Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) has moved this court for summary judgment on the complaint filed by plaintiff Sylvia D.Y. Kim (“plaintiff”). Plaintiff has filed both an opposition to State Farm’s motion and a counter-motion for summary judgment.
In her complaint based upon federal diversity jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1332(a) (West Supp.1989), plaintiff seeks a declaration pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- British Airways Board, 1 v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. Jack W. SavageCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Calvert v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Faythe S. Takahashi and Hideo H. Takahashi v. Loomis Armored Car Service, and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
- AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc. v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Sylvia D.Y. Kim v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- National Union Fire Insurance v. RagilHawaii Supreme Court · 1991