Legal Opinion

Sylvia D.Y. Kim v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 24, 1991No. 90-15691PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

State Farm appeals from an order denying its motion for summary judgment and granting Sylvia Kim’s cross-motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

The parties agree that no genuine issue of material fact exists. Sylvia Kim was seriously injured in an accident while riding in an automobile owned by her father, Edward Kim, and driven by her mother, Agnes Kim. The “accident vehicle” was insured by State Farm. State Farm paid Sylvia Kim $35,000, the limit for primary bodily injury under the liability insurance provision of the policy insuring the accident vehicle.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co. v. Financial Security InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kang v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. DuranArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Kim v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. VillicanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Stutzman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Monroe v. COGSWELL AGENCYMontana Supreme Court · 2010
  4. AIG Hawaii Ins. Co., Inc. v. SmithHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. ReynoldsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API