Legal Opinion

National Union Fire Insurance v. Ragil

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1991No. 14726PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

WAKATSUKI, J.

Two certified questions are presented by the United States District Court for the District of Hawaii for review by this court pursuant to Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 13.

CERTIFIED QUESTIONS OF LAW

1) May a person operating a vehicle which he owned but failed to insure, who is injured as a result of the negligence of an underinsured party receive under-insured motorist benefits under a family member’s automobile insurance policy which policy covers family members but excludes underinsured motorists coverage for bodily injury sustained by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Palisbo v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kau v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Kim v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dines v. Pacific Ins. Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mikelson v. United Services Automobile Ass'nHawaii Supreme Court · 2005
  3. National Union Fire Insurance Co. v. ReynoldsHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Allstate Indemnity Co. v. GonzalesColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Progressive Casualty Insurance v. FergusonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API