Legal Opinion
Shalaby v. Bernzomatic
District Court, S.D. California
Decided March 9, 2012No. Civil No. 11cv68 AJB (POR)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*568ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING EX PARTE APPLICATION TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT; AND DENYING REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE
ANTHONY J. BATTAGLIA, District Judge.
Defendants’ filed a motion to dismiss, [Doc. No. 36], the Plaintiffs Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) for failure to state a claim pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and also argues that the Plaintiffs claims are barred by the statute of limitations. The Plaintiff filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss, [Doc. No. 37] , and subsequently filed a request for judicial notice on January 25, 2012,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Deerpoint Grp., Inc. v. Agrigenix, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Armstrong Coal Company, Inc. v. Nathan AtteburyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Armstrong Coal Company, Inc. v. Nathan AtteburyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Armstrong Coal Company, Inc. v. Nathan AtteburyKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
- Johnson v. Athenix Physicians Group, Inc.'sDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021