Armstrong Coal Company, Inc. v. Nathan Attebury
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
llleoRTANT NoTlcE NoT To BE PuBLlsHED 0PlNloN THls 0PlNloN ls DEslGNATED "NoT To BE PuBLlsHED.” PuRsUANT To‘_THE RuLEs oF clvlL PRocEDuRE PRolvluLGATED BY THE suPREME couRT, cR 76.28(4)(€), THls 0PlNloN ls NoT To BE PuBLlsHED AND sHALL NoT BE clTED oR usED As BlNDlNG PREcEDENT lN ANY oTHER cAsE lN ANv-couRT oF THls sTATE; HOWEVER, uNPuBLlsHED KENTucKY APPELLATE DEclsloNs,k RENDERED AFTER JANuARY 1, 2003, MAY BE clTED FoR coNleERATloN BY THE couRT lF THERE ls No PuBLlsHED 0PlNloN THAT wouLD ADEQUATELY ADDREss THE lssuE , BEFoRE THE couRT. oPlNloNs clTED FoR coNleERATloN BY THE couRT sHALL BE…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Western Baptist Hospital v. KellyKentucky Supreme Court · 1992
- Wolf Creek Collieries v. CrumCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1984
- Whittaker v. RowlandKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Shalaby v. BernzomaticDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2012