Legal Opinion

People v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 25, 1978No. Civ. No. 16355PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

EVANS, J.

In this eminent domain proceeding, we consider whether the trial court properly construed defendant’s1 (Southern Pacific Transportation Company) interest in the land and correctly applied appropriate valuation standards in determining the award of damages. We have concluded that the interest taken by the state was properly categorized and correctly valued.

Plaintiff, State of California, Department of Transportation (Caltrans), sought to condemn land in Sacramento for use as Highway 50. A portion of the land needed was a strip approximately 6,380 feet long, averaging *32021 feet in…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Virginia Electric & Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. La MacChiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. NealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Department of Water Resources v. AndresenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  2. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. v. S. Pac. Transp.California Court of Appeal · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API