ERIC JERONE WILLIAMS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent.

I concur in the per curiam opinion. I write separately to offer the following two suggestions.

First, Moore v. State, 458 S.W.3d 822 (Mo.banc 2015), had not yet been decided when the amended motion was filed and evidentiary hearing was conducted in this case. Moore had been handed down, however, before the order denying relief was entered. The untimeliness Of the filing of the amended motion was first raised by this Court on its own motion during the appeal while conducting the required Moore timeliness review. So long as a mere one-day delay can trigger what has happened here, I urge judges…