Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. McDaniel

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 3, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 88-0211PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Chief Judge.

This appeal is taken from a summary judgment in favor of Continental Insurance Company declaring that the acts of John G. Handgis were not covered by a comprehensive business policy issued to a partnership doing business as Darby’s Restaurant— Coffee Shop (Darby’s). The issues raised concern the policy definition of “occurrence” as an accident which results in bodily injury “neither expected nor intended from the standpoint of the insured” as related to the torts of sexual harassment, assault and battery, and intentional infliction of mental suffering. We affirm.

F…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ford v. Revlon, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Transamerica Insurance Group v. MeereArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Farmers Ins. Co. of Arizona v. VagnozziArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Clark v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Phoenix Control System, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Millar v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Dotts v. Taressa J.A.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. JacobsonDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
  5. Ohio Casualty Insurance v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API