Legal Opinion

Broesche v. Bullock

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1968No. 90PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRON, Justice.

This is an appeal by Charles Francis Broesche and his son, Charles Rodney Broesche, defendants in the trial court, from an adverse judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs below, Maxine Bullock and husband, Walter Dan Bullock, in a negligence action for injuries and damages suffered by Mrs. Bullock. On special issues submitted to the jury, the trial court rendered judgment in favor of ap-pellees for $44,500.00. From the judgment below, appellants, Charles F. Broesche and Charles R. Broesche, have properly perfected their appeal.

At approximately 1:30 o’clock in the afternoon of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Simmonds v. St. Louis, Brownsville & Mexico Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Mundy v. Pirie-Slaughter Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Seinsheimer v. BurkhartTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Walgreen Texas Co. v. ShiversTexas Supreme Court · 1941

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HavardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Curley v. General Valet Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  3. Gonzales v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  4. Bristol-Myers Co. v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  5. Halford v. Alamo Rent-A-Car, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API