Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided August 31, 1977No. 1155PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NYE, Chief Justice.

This is an invasion of privacy action. Trial was to a jury which answered special issues in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court, however, granted the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and entered a take nothing judgment favoring the defendant telephone company. The plaintiffs have perfected their appeal to this Court.

The controversy arose initially when the plaintiffs refused to put up an additional $50.00 deposit for the two phones they had in their residence. After several attempts by the telephone company to obtain the deposit, the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Billings v. AtkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Green v. RudsenskeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  4. J. A. Robinson Sons, Inc. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  5. Continental Bus System, Inc. v. ToombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Tidelands Automobile Club v. Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1985
  2. Trevino v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  3. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
  4. Gill v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
  5. K-Mart Corp. Store No. 7441 v. Trotti, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API