Gonzales v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NYE, Chief Justice.
This is an invasion of privacy action. Trial was to a jury which answered special issues in favor of the plaintiffs. The trial court, however, granted the defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto and entered a take nothing judgment favoring the defendant telephone company. The plaintiffs have perfected their appeal to this Court.
The controversy arose initially when the plaintiffs refused to put up an additional $50.00 deposit for the two phones they had in their residence. After several attempts by the telephone company to obtain the deposit, the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Billings v. AtkinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1973
- Green v. RudsenskeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
- J. A. Robinson Sons, Inc. v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Continental Bus System, Inc. v. ToombsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Tidelands Automobile Club v. Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1985
- Trevino v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Martin, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1997
- Gill v. SnowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- K-Mart Corp. Store No. 7441 v. Trotti, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.