Legal Opinion

Dallas Railway & Terminal Co. v. Bailey

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1952No. A-3553PublishedCited by 178 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Calvert

Mrs. Sarah Jane Bailey, a widow, was injured when an automobile in which she was riding as a guest collided with the . rear end of a bus owned by Dallas Railway & Terminal Company. In the trial court, Mrs. Bailey recovered a judgment of damages against the Railway & Terminal Company, but the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded for retrial by the Court of Civil Appeals. 245 S.W. 2d 275. Both parties applied for writ of error, the application of the Railway & Terminal Company being based upon its point that certain conduct of Mrs. Bailey was contributory negligence as a matter of law…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Phoenix Refining Co. v. TipsTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WashingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Hicks v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Colorado &. S. Ry. Co. v. RoweTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  5. Galveston v. KutacTexas Supreme Court · 1889

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by178 opinions

  1. Columbia Rio Grande Healthcare, L.P. v. HawleyTexas Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Co. v. McFerrinTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Reinhart v. YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Lemos v. MontezTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Morris v. JTM Materials, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002

173 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API