Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 25, 1985No. 84-6735-CIVPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
GONZALEZ, District Judge.
On June 18, 1985, 611 F.Supp. 218, the court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint, and reserved ruling on defendants’ motion to compel arbitration pending the submission of documentary evidence by the parties regarding fraudulent inducement, unconscionability or lack of mutuality of the arbitration agreement, (docket #34) The court instructed plaintiff to file any additional affidavits or other proof in support of its position with regard to arbitration, and then accorded defendants time to file a legal response of their own.
Plaintiff and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In the Matter of the Arbitration Between Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated v. Helen Echo HayduCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Melvin J. Wick and Shari L. Wick v. Atlantic Marine, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- Allied Van Lines, Inc. v. BrattonSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
- All Florida Surety Company v. CokerSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Shotto v. LaubDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986
- Rhoades v. PowellDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1986
- Rocz v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Samson Plastic Conduit & Pipe Corp. v. Battenfeld Extrusionstechnik GMBHDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1989
- UNITED SER. GENERAL LIFE CO. v. BauerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.