Legal Opinion

Rocz v. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 29, 1987No. 1 CA-CIV 8883PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORCORAN, Judge.

We consider whether the superior court properly denied the motion by Drexel Bum-ham Lambert, Incorporated (Drexel) to compel arbitration of the federal-securities, state-statutory, and common-law claims of appellee Susan Ward Rocz (Rocz).

In light of the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shearson/American Express, Inc. v. McMahon, 482 U.S.-, 107 S.Ct. 2332, 96 L.Ed.2d 185 (1987), we reverse as to both the federal and state law claims.

1. Facts

Rocz opened an account with Drexel to purchase and sell securities. Rocz agreed that any controversy arising out of her securities…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Shearson/American Express Inc. v. McMahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Wilko v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Pulte Home Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  2. Coup v. Scottsdale Plaza Resort, LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
  3. International Creative Management, Inc. v. D & R Entertainment Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Paduano v. Express Scripts, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  5. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API