Legal Opinion
Shotto v. Laub
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided April 7, 1986No. Civ. A. M-85-4181PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Mr. and Mrs. John R. Shotto and Timothy C. Spigelmire, filed this action against defendants, R. Michael Laub, Jr. and Drexel Burnham Lambert Incorporated (Drexel), alleging various claims arising out of defendants’ handling of plaintiffs’ securities accounts (Paper No. 1). Plaintiffs appear to allege in the 13-count Complaint violations of §§ 5 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the 1933 Act), as amended, 15 U.S.C. §§ 77e and 771; 1 Rule 10b-5) 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated under § 10(b) of the Securities Exchange…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Sheldon v. VermontyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Spahr Ex Rel. Spahr v. SeccoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Vaughan S. Newcome v. A. Jack Esrey Shearson Lehman Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Dougherty v. MieczkowskiDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1987
- Scher v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.