Legal Opinion

Nicolin v. Schneiderhan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 1, 1887PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by defendant from a, judgment of the district court for Scott county, where the action was tried by Macdonald, J., without a jury-.

1Opinion of the Court

Mitchell, J.1

The plaintiff, being the owner of a tract of land, executed and recorded a plat of it as “Nicolin’s Addition to Jordan *64City.” He then conveyed lot 1, in this addition, according to the recorded plat thereof, to one Hoskins, through whom defendant acquired title. As shown upon this plat, lot 1 extended north and south from Water street to Sand creek, the street being represented as the north, and the creek as the south, boundary. The east and west lines of the lot are represented as extending from the street to the creek, and upon these lines are figures giving their length as 35…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Board of Park Commissioners v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. White v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
  3. Dittrich v. UblSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  4. Erkens v. NicolinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
  5. Wilson v. Chicago Lumber & Timber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API