Legal Opinion

Erkens v. Nicolin

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 28, 1888PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal by defendant, from an order of the district court- for ’Scott county, Eclson, J., presiding, refusing a new trial after a trial by the court.

1Opinion of the Court

'Mitchell, J.

Action to recover back the money paid by plaintiff to defendant for a quitclaim deed of a piece of land in the village of . Jordan. The facts, as disclosed by the evidence, are that defendant • platted into lots a tract of land, of which he was the owner, lying between Water street and Sand creek. As shown upon the plat, the north and south lines of the lots extend from Water street to the creek. The distance marked on the plat gave the length of these lines as 80 feet, but the actual distance from Water street to the ..creek was 110 feet. One of these lots, and the adjoining 35…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Perkins v. TrinkaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Hall v. WheelerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Nicolin v. SchneiderhanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Heckman & Co. v. I. S. Dawes & Son Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1926
  2. Board of Park Commissioners v. TaylorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  3. Pettibone v. Cook County, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. Armijo v. HenryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Cohen v. Swift & Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API