Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1

I dissent.

I deem it proper to say that my conclusions on all but two of the errors claimed *295by appellants are the same as those of my associates, although I am not in full accord with the reasons given by them.

My dissent is based upon my conviction that by an instruction given the jury the appellants were erroneously deprived of the benefit of Mr. Veatch’s testimony as to the element of contractor’s profit in his “reproduction new” valuation; and that the Court erroneously struck from the record all of the severance damage testimony relating to the Bellingham office building.

These are…