Legal Opinion

Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co. v. Horton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 21, 1931PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is a proceeding conducted under the Condemnation Law, pursuant to authority of subdivision 3 of section 624 of the Conservation Law (as amd. by Laws of 1922, chap. 242). Briefly the statute provides that the owner of “ a major part of the head and volume of the usable flow ” of “a single undeveloped water power site ” may acquire the minor rights by condemnation proceedings, after first obtaining from the Public Service Commission a certificate (1) that the power site sought to be condemned is a single one; (2) that the corporation seeking the certificate is the owner of the major part…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of New York v. SageSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Emmons v. Utilities Power Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927
  3. In re SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. In re Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co.New York Supreme Court · 1925
  5. In re the Niagara, Lockport & Ontario Power Co.New York Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Andrews v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Claims · 1959
  3. State Ex Rel. Mondale v. Independent School District No. 31Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  4. Board of Supervisors v. Sherlo Realty, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
  5. In re Acquisition of Real Property by the County of ClintonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API