Legal Opinion

McGannon v. Michigan Millers' Mutual Fire-Insurance

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1901PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Assumpsit by John George McGannon against the Michigan Millers’ Mutual Fire-Insurance Company upon a policy of insurance. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The defendant is a fire-insurance company organized under the laws of the State of Michigan, with its principal office at Lansing, Mich. The plaintiff is the owner, by assignment from the Yerona Roller-Mill Company, of a policy of insurance issued to said Yerona Roller-Mill Company by the defendant company. In March, 1899, the Yerona Roller-Mill Company made a written *638application for insurance. Among other things stated in the application are the following:

“ What facilities have you in the way of force-pumps, extinguishers, etc., for putting out fire ?
“A. Waterworks.
“Do you agree to keep a…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  3. National Bank v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Waters v. Merchants' Louisville InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1837

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sweaney & Smith Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Port Blakely Mill Co. v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Theriault v. California InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Benham v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. McGannon v. Millers' National InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API