Citibank v. Van Velzer
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
¶ 1 Appellant Citibank appeals from the trial court’s granting of summary judgment dismissing its promissory note deficiency action against appellee Virginia Van Velzer. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
¶2 In July 1988, Oracle/Roger Limited Partnership (the Partnership) borrowed $2,250,000 from Citibank to acquire real property and build a shopping center. It signed a promissory note and deed of trust documenting the transaction. John Van Velzer, Virginia’s husband at the time, also signed the promissory note “individually.” In consideration for his execution of the loan documents,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Consolidated Roofing & Supply Co. v. GrimmCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Schwarz v. City of GlendaleCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Dalton v. George B. Hatley Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Godfrey State Bank v. MundyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- RACKMASTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. MaderiaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Board of County Commissions v. Park County Sportsmen's Ranch, LLPColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- State Ex Rel. Mendez v. AMERICAN SUPPORTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Krudy v. Simpson (In re Simpson)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Indiana · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.